This is a day of remembrances and I had to smile this morning as I listened to historians Doris Kearns Goodwin and David Kennedy on the radio asking an interesting series of "what if" questions. High on their list: What if President had actually united the country by taking some concrete steps to reduce our oil consumption, which remains the primary financial prop for Middle Eastern terror?
Their comments reminded me of my own first reactions to the terrible events of five years ago. Sitting in my home office, cut off from my students in lower Manhattan (I was teaching at New York University at the time), I penned these words for Marketplace Radio. The commentary aired on September 18, 2001:
America is in a war against terrorism and people on the home front want to help. But what should they do? Progressives like myself wring our hands about defending civil liberties and stemming hatred during these perilous times. But that’s not enough.If we want to catch the hearts and minds of the American people, we have to say more. I propose that we use this moment of national grief and unified purpose to advance a positive agenda.
First, let’s immediately wean America from its depends on foreign oil. As Daniel Yergen wrote in “The Prize,” oil has fueled both economic growth and great conflicts in the 20th century. But in the 21st century, it has become albatross around the advanced industrial world’s neck.
It is the primary source of not only air pollution and global warming, but of geopolitical instability. Isn’t it shocking that so many of the terrorists came from Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producing state? The technology is there today to end our oil dependency. If it wanted to, the automobile industry could within five years have every vehicle rolling off assembly lines using clean technologies like fuel cells or battery-powered hybrid engines.
Second, America is now faced with a crisis in the airline industry. Let’s build a high speed rail system. That would solve two problems. It would reduce our appetite for oil, and take the pressure off the airlines by eliminating most flights under 300 miles. We’re dreading that airport gridlock and long lines for security checks. We could entangle that mess by shifting government investment into high speed trains. And by building a high speed rail system, it would create tens of thousands of jobs, just what the economy needs right now. And don’t forget: the Interstate Highway System was built in the name of national defense.
Ending our dependence from foreign oil; a high speed rail system; jobs from a major public works project – these home front programs are practical, they are progressive, and they would give the economy a boost. And most importantly, it would unite the nation in the home front war on terrorism in a way that doesn’t sacrifice our basic freedoms.
In Washington, this is Merrill Goozner for Marketplace.
What can we say about the Bush administration's response to 9/11 five years later? It still hasn't begun work on this crucial agenda. Instead:
He squandered the lives of our nation's youth and the national treasury on a war that had nothing to do with terrorism.
He created greater instability in the Middle East and multiplied anti-American zealotry manyfold.
He allowed foreign producers and oil conglomerates to capture ALL the revenue from a tripling of gasoline prices.
He did nothing to improve our domestic public health infrastructure - the front line of defense against a possible bioterrorist attack.
He alienated our allies and created new enemies.
He used the war on terror for his own political advantage. thus weakening the nation by dividing it.
9/11 was the worst single foreign attack on American soil in U.S. history. There are many reasons why this dastardly action by a hidden, non-state enemy and the subsequent response cannot be compared to Pearl Harbor or even the blowing of the Maine in Cuba, which triggered the Spanish American War. This was destined to be a mindset, not a war, at least, not in the traditional sense.
Some version of the "war on terror" has become a semi-permanent fixture in American life -- more like the Cold War than World War II. So it really matters how we fight this war. The wise course would have focused like a laser on the real issues that led to this breach of national security and domestic tranquility. Such an approach would have united the nation, and rallied our allies permanently to our side.
Instead, we got the most destructive course imaginable. Hell, the perpetrator of 9/11 at still large. My weekend newspaper told me the trail in the hunt for Osama bin Laden has turned stone cold.
By every objective measure on the one issue that even the President says he should ultimately be judged, George W. Bush has been a total failure.
Posted by gooznews at September 11, 2006 05:13 PMMerrill--
Terrific article! I've often wondered what YOUR opinion was about some of the issues troubling our country. The journalistic equanamity with which you write is always so objective that I've lumped you with other "reporters," who "just report the news." This commemorative article, however, is passionately outstanding. Thanks for writing it.
Melody
http://www.tooprofitabletocure.com
Merrill -
Your article is magnificently cogent and its urgent message totally unheeded.
Over twenty years ago, a friend commented to me that if we wanted to deliberately sabotage the economy of the United States, we would do exactly what has been done - proliferate the wasteful system of transportation of people and goods by vehicles and neglect the railroad system.
Can you think of a more dangerous combination than the following -
A fanatical, homocidal and suicidal religion
A booming population of Muslims with not enough employment opportunities for their young
An oil economy which drains the economic strength
of our country while it strenthens our adversary
Unlimited coffers of oil money for our adversary to buy nuclear technology and to develop nuclear warheads and missiles
At NASCAR and other races around the country, we burn huge quantities of gasoline for sport as the domestic crowd cheers.
Posted by: Philip Rudnick at September 17, 2006 12:41 AM