March 29, 2007

Income Inequality

Why wasn't this story on page one?

Today's New York Times reports that income inequality in the U.S. last year reached levels not seen since the eve of the Great Depression. An accompany chart shows that the more equal distribution of income that was created during and immedately after World War II began eroding in 1980 and now has been completely reversed.

You should read the whole story, but here's some deflating tidbits:

The new data also shows that the top 300,000 Americans collectively enjoyed almost as much income as the bottom 150 million Americans. Per person, the top group received 440 times as much as the average person in the bottom half earned, nearly doubling the gap from 1980. . .

The analysis . . . showed that the top 10 percent of Americans collected 48.5 percent of all reported income in 2005. That is an increase of more than 2 percentage points over the previous year and up from roughly 33 percent in the late 1970s. The peak for this group was 49.3 percent in 1928. . .

The top 1 percent received 21.8 percent of all reported income in 2005, up significantly from 19.8 percent the year before and more than double their share of income in 1980. The peak was in 1928, when the top 1 percent reported 23.9 percent of all income. . .

The top tenth of a percent and top one-hundredth of a percent recorded even bigger gains in 2005 over the previous year. Their incomes soared by about a fifth in one year, largely because of the rising stock market and increased business profits. The top tenth of a percent reported an average income of $5.6 million, up $908,000, while the top one-hundredth of a percent had an average income of $25.7 million, up nearly $4.4 million in one year. . .

And how about the rest of us?

While total reported income in the United States increased almost 9 percent in 2005, the most recent year for which such data is available, average incomes for those in the bottom 90 percent dipped slightly compared with the year before, dropping $172, or 0.6 percent.
Posted by gooznews at March 29, 2007 05:45 AM
Comments

Absolutely, this should be on page one! And, to add insult to (fatal) injury, the family of the 12-year old homeless boy who died recently from an untreated toothache, Deamonte Driver, is probably not even in the statistics. Note that the income data in the study came from preliminary figures from the IRS, i.e., from tax filings. Even though Deamonte's mother worked at several jobs to feed her family, her income was probably so low that she didn't have to file income tax, and most people in that situation don't file their taxes. So the NY Times article likely underestimated the extent of income inequality.

Poverty is the biggest risk factor for poor health. There, Deamonte was probably also excluded from another page one statistic--the 98,000 deaths a year due to medical error. Those figures count errors of commission, not an omission like the failure to treat someone at all.

We have to give a name, and a face, and a voice to these victims. PatientSafetyBlog.com tells these stories.

Posted by: Ken Farbstein at March 30, 2007 12:28 PM