The Washington Monthly's Kevin Drum in his blog post a few days ago picked up on an important error in reports (including mine) that alleged nearly half of physicians failed to report medical errors. In fact, only 40 percent of physicians knew about serious medical errors committed by their colleagues, according to a chart book put out by Columbia University's Institute for Medicine as a Profession, which sponsored the study. So if 46 percent failed to report errors in at least one instance, the total is closer to 18.4 percent of ALL physicians who failed to report a serious medical error.
It's an important distinction, and it's important to correct errors, including my own. But the fact remains that 92 percent of physicians believe they should report errors, which is as close to unanimous as you're going to get in a survey. Is there any reason to think the behavior in the 60 percent who did not witness errors would be any different than the ones who had? I think the authors of the study were trying to suggest that the nearly half who failed to report errors were suggestive as to how the profession as a whole would react if confronted with that situation.
The precise wording of the question, contained in Table 2 of "Professionalism in Medicine: Results of a National Survey of Physicians" by Eric G. Campbell et al in this week's Annals of Internal Medicine, reads:
In the last 3 years, have you had direct personal knowledge of a serious medical error in your hospital, group, or practice? If yes, how often did you report that error to a hospital, clinic, professional society, or other relevant authority? (1. Always, 2. Usually, 3. Sometimes, 4. Never).
In the report, they do not report the percent who answered "yes" to the first part of that question. They only report in Table 2 and in the discussion that 46 percent answered either 2, 3, or 4 to the second part, meaning that at least once they failed to report a serious medical error. The chart book, which accompanied the release of the study, on Slide 32, reports that 40 percent knew about serious medical errors. But is hard to know whether to trust the chart book, which appears to have been prepared by a public relations agency. That same slide also reports that just 31 percent failed to report serious medical errors, which is not the same as what was reported in Table 2.
Posted by gooznews at December 6, 2007 10:09 AMDoctors cannot speak up for one simple reason. Professional destruction. Speak up and all the work that you have done and the years you have sacrificed to become a physician are ENDED. This witch trial burning at the proverbial stake has been going on ever since sham peer review achieved state and federal immunity. Doctors do try to speak out and this is what happens: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/03299/234499.stm
There are a few organizations that help physicians survive after they do speak out:
http://www.peerreview.org/
SamEyeAm
Posted by: SamEyeAm at December 7, 2007 08:29 AMAn important clarification is needed: Does "I failed to report it" exclude cases where the doc knew that the error already was being reported/recorded? The wording of the choices could make a big difference here.
Posted by: davey at December 8, 2007 12:31 PMFrom what I can tell by reading the survey questions, the question was open-ended, so some who answered yes may have done so because someone else had already reported it and thus biased the results. You might want to write Eric Campbell, the primary author, at Harvard and ask.
Fear of retribution is real. So is the tendency of guilds to protect their own. Critics like me and the Institute on Medicine as a Profession who hurl bricks from the ivory tower rarely take into account the actual conditions on the ground. This is fertile territory for enterprising reporters, like the one in the article you site.
Posted by: Merrill at December 10, 2007 07:41 AM